This morning, I receive an email in my inbox outlining some of the bargaining terms that my school district in OR are discussing with the teacher union.
One of the district proposals was to increase the elementary school day by 30 minutes.
Now, you will often hear teachers lament, "we need more time!," which is something I agree with. I know that more time is more instructional time, more planning time, more time to cooperate with other teachers, more professional development time, more grading time, more time to pick pencil and crayons up off the floor at the end of the day, and often more personal time to recover from all stress of being pulled in a million different directions throughout the day (without the freedom to break for food/drink/bathroom when needed!). There are
lots of areas in which we could benefit from more time, yet at my school, I always felt most short on time during the school day. I would frequently think, "If I only had 30 more minutes, I could (insert any number of activities here). So I was intrigued when I read that the district wants to add 30 more minutes to the school day. Seems like the teachers and the powers at be in the district are on the same page??!. Yet, in stepped the union, whose contradictions to this proposal were presented in the next paragraph of the document.
The union stated that adding instructional time will interfere with teacher prep time (which is true, yet we are promised 30 minutes daily which we get during the school day and we additionally have 1.5 hours after school). Yes, I am aware that often we are required to attend meetings and attend to other business during the school day that prevents us from actually sitting down (whether alone or with team members) to actually plan quality activities and instruction) and that often our 30 minute "prep" period during the day goes by faster than a New York Minute because 30 minutes is barely enough time to dash to the bathroom, breathe a sigh of relief, and blink a few times. I do agree, however that adding 30 more minutes to the instructional day would provide a bit more flexibility in scheduling and would result in more time for learning (that is a
good thing, we like time for learning!). The union also cited that adding more time to the school day would add more stress to the amount that teachers are already feeling. Again, a valid point, yet ultimately, I think I would go for 30 more minutes.
If we keep in mind the reasons why we decided to become teachers, and we think about the goals we have for students, and the fact that the district probably got this idea to add time from us when we constantly proclaim that time is exactly what we need more of, I think adding 30 minutes to the school day does not sound that unreasonable. Apparently, when compared to other local districts, our elementary day is the shortest. We begin at 8:10 and end at 2:30. What are we in Germany? (Just kidding, but it irks me that kids in Germany are done with school around 12:30 or 1 and I cannot fathom how they possible fit everything into that minuscule timetable!). When we had a unreal amount of snow days in OR a few years back, the district ended up adding time to each day to make up for lost time and we seamlessly transitioned to having a longer day. It worked. We survived. Ending at 3:00 would still provide us with an entire hour after children left for other "teacher business."
I know that our unions exist to protect us and often they are protecting me from issues and consequences that I don't even realize might occur based on years of experience and precedent from previous changes. I know that there is deep thought behind each point the union stands for. I know that they are only looking out for us and in many situations, with regards to many issues that could lead to very negative consequences for our teaching force, they most certainly have our back. Our bargaining team spent countless hours a few years back negotiating our contracts and helped to secure wage increases, helped maintain money PD and tuition reimbursement and many other "clutch" things. They were an incredible team of unstoppable, determined leaders within the district. I was thankful that they were willing to take on a role that I didn't even have the first clue how to do myself.
Yet, I can't help but feel the union and the district are at odds with almost every single thing the district tries to do! With the exception of trying to get back full day Kindergarten (which I am all for), every change suggested by the district was criticized by the union and I can't help but feel like the union is somewhat at fault (ok that is not the right word, but gets my point across) for the negative reputation teachers have gotten. If our unions argue against any proposals that make us have to work more or put in more effort or course we look bad. Again, I know there are often ramifications for changes that I am not experienced enough to understand, yet aren't there plenty of teachers out there who simply don't want to battle it out with the district and just want to do what is best for kids?
Of course, I don't ever want to be taken advantage of as a teacher, and I want to be compensated for my work. I appreciate the help of the union when it protects me against the harm that comes from changes that are not in the best interests of teachers.
I also think kids come first. If it is good for kids, but not as convenient for me, I am okay with that.
Truly great educators understand the rigors of the job and can be willing to take the workload in stride because the ultimate payoff (the success of students!) is well worth the blood, sweat, and tears, the lugging home of the teacher bag to do grading and planning on the weekends, the early mornings and late afternoons spent in the classrooms instead of with husbands, wives, and kids, and the subsequent nightly teeth grinding (anyone else have that problem) that comes along with being a part of one of the most important institutions out there.
So, my hope is the our teacher union begins to reflect a greater level of
unity with the district with the realization that if we are going to fix education, we truly need to put the students first.
***Disclaimer...I am only basing this post on information I have based on my own experiences in one particular district. Your situation could quite possibly be very different.***
Do you think teacher unions are positive or negative for teacher images?
Do you understand this district/union dance more than I do? If so, please share your wisdom!