Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Rethinking

After receiving some comments about my post yesterday (and Ms. Eagertoteach's comment in particular), I did some more thinking with regards to my assignment and what I truly think would be the best way to make a change to the current plan for ELL students in my district. As I wrote in my previous post, I was feeling unsure of how I had responded to the assignment and I was worried what I was saying would be controversial in class. I think what I realized is the reason I was nervous to turn in what I wrote was that I was simply not comfortable with it. I would not want to have to argue my point because it wasn't really the point I wanted to make. I know I can be wishy washy (mostly because I am open minded to the ideas of others and sometimes feel a tennis match within my mind agreeing with valid points on both sides of an argument), but if I truly believe in what I am saying, then I won't be afraid to share my opinions about it.

When I read Ms. Eager's comment, I immediately responded to her saying that I really hope I did not come across as being anti-bilingual education because I most certainly am not. I completely agreed with the points she made about the importance of literacy in one's native language. She made me realize that I really wanted to refine my ideas. I took one of my books off the shelf today and read up on the history of policy pertaining to ELL students including different types of language immersion, bilingual, and English only programs. As I read the arguments for teaching in English only, I did not feel those ideals matched my own. I am not at all favoring English as the 'better' language and I am certainly not in favor of monolingual-ism. I don't think that children who speak another language should let that language fall to the wayside in order to become proficient in English, nor should they have to 'assimilate' into the dominant culture. I think both languages should be nurtured. Bilingual and multilingual individuals, in my opinion, certainly have an advantage over people who only speak one language because they have the capacity to communicate with more people and that is a great thing! I was trying to come up with a solution that would ultimately bring ELL students closer to the district goals, yet I don't believe my initial attempt was the right way to go.

After doing some thinking, I decided that rather than suggesting to completely remove the Spanish Language Arts program that is still operating in three of our schools, I would prefer to 'refine' it. If the goal is to have students learn in their native language in order to foster a smoother transition to English, I do think that the program should incorporate both English and Spanish instruction instead of Spanish only. I thought about proposing that the aspects of reading instruction that would transfer to English instruction later on such as comprehension strategies, vocabulary, learning about the parts of books and different kinds of texts, how to choose appropriate books, retelling etc could be taught in Spanish. The children would have an easier time understanding these ideas/concepts if they were discussed in Spanish. Other aspects of reading instruction such as phonics, phonemic awareness, letter names and sounds, and fluency could be practiced in both languages. In a more side by side approach incorporating bilingual books or both English and Spanish versions of stories, the children could benefit from having access to both languages as tools to learn and increase their skills. Yes, it would be hard to fit everything in and this would require the use of a different instructional program or perhaps combination of the English and Spanish versions, but I think it could work with the right staffing.

After reflecting, I realized I don't think that opportunities to learn in Spanish should be removed, but I do think that there needs to be more of an effort to include reading instruction in English from the beginning so that students do not transition into English only reading classes in third grade with the expectation that they will be able to take state assessments in English within a few months. That is a lot to ask. Even if the Spanish program emphasized learning to read in Spanish, I think it should follow more of a bilingual model than strictly native language.It is nice to have follow bloggers as a means to process ideas and I am happy that I have revised this assignment (at least in my mind) so that I can submit something I am completely happy with.

Thanks for the comments that came in! I am always so glad to have access to people who make me think deeper and more thoroughly!

4 comments:

eager2teach said...

Mrs. Sneaker,

I am so happy that you feel proud and confident in your perspective on bilingual education. I would love to hear about how your class responds to what you are 'proposing'. I cannot wait to learn more about the bilingual program at my school and what it is really like when implemented. I look forward to sharing all that I learn!

This is my last week in my 5th grade classroom. Thanks for all of the support you have given me this last year. Your advice and 'listening ears' have been incredible to have. Thanks again!

Jen said...

I have to be honest and haven't read your other post in its entirety (but I will) This is such a hot topic in my district. We are moving to a duel language program as opposed to bilingual program. Which is exactly what you talk about here. I have to say I have my opinions and it seems to change often as I see students going through this program. Duel language is not just for your ELL student but any student who's parents want them to learn in both English and Spanish. I've seen amazing things from these programs but have also seen students struggle because they don't get a firm foundation in either language. I agree in the importance of cultivating a student's native language but also see the importance of learning English! Those are all great points. I have to get ready for work but I'll be back to read more later this afternoon!!

Have a great day

Jen

shermantheschnauzer said...

Is there a dual language/bilingual component at your international school Katie? I was curious how they do things. :) Happy Tuesday/Wednesday.

We are TAKS testing here in Texas (BLAH)

Zarahi said...

My perspective about bilingual education at this time, after working as an ELL teacher for the past 7 years is that students who speak a second language at home, should be able to learn their first language formally (at school) after 4-5 grades. Specifically in the Middle School. The state tests are a big reason for this. I am a firm believer of bilingualism, but my experience tells me that it is easier and faster for most students to learn (academically speaking) one language at a time. English is not "the most important language", yet it is. Students in the US live in an English speaking country; that's the reality. I think the trick and the challenge is to provide with a qualified language teacher in the Middle School who will help them become literate in their native language. I would make this class mandatory. It would mean that even if there's a handful of students who speak a given language, there will be a teacher for them. I know this is quite an utopia given the demands Middle School puts into students - not to mention teachers; but I think it's an option worth considering. I suspect this would very easily help the students level up - as needed, if not catapult after their Middle School experience is over.
I do not know of a District who does it this way. I would be curious to hear from someone who might do this or something like this.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails

What I'm Reading

Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog